Podillia Provincial Ordinary Court of Appeal (1818-1840): Establishing, Staffing, and Social Portrait

Keywords: Podillia Provincial Ordinary Court of Appeal, Podillia province, surveying according to the Polish judicial tradition, judge, official

Abstract

The paper states that Alexander I continued the policy of dialogue with the Polish local elite: for the sake of loyalty, the supreme power gave several concessions. The Polish judicial tradition was preserved (in Russian provinces general surveying was carried out on other principles), an important element of which was to carry out the land surveying of local landlords and tenants. At the request of the nobility, the authorities created a more efficient surveying system, first at the county level, and from 1818 – the provincial. The enlarged staff of county surveying courts sped up the process of estates surveying. The final decisions of Podilia Provincial Ordinary Court of Appeal had to reduce tension in the relations of the county gentry and complete the process of surveying.

The composition of the court was: the Head elected for three years, 12 judges and appointed officials. The Head of the Provincial Ordinary Court of Appeal, obviously, not without the assistance of local authorities, was an experienced, wealthy official who had shown his loyalty. However, judges, mostly, were young and inexperienced wealthy nobles, some of whom accepted the service as conscription. Analysis of blank forms allows getting information about age, property, education, career path, professionalism and marital status of the judiciary. For the preservation of state property during the surveying of private estates, the court included also former officials, elected under pressure of the authorities. The court officials were young poor nobles who had the appropriate education to perform their duties. For certain categories (county officials and land surveyors), the authorities set out qualification requirements: training in specialized educational institutions. To save money Supreme power underfinanced the Provincial Ordinary Court of Appeal. Only since 1825, the situation started to improve, but in general, the salary was insufficient (for the sake of justice it should be noted that some clerks chose the court and not the advocacy). The state, in response to the loyalty of the elite, allowed the Polish nobility to regulate land relations between private landowners and land users independently but did not allow the loss of state property.

References

Akmanov, A.I. (2012). Mezhevye raboty na bashkirskikh zemliakh v kontse ХVІІІ-ХІХ vv. [Surveying Works on the Bashkir Lands at the end of the XVIII – XIX centuries]. Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta, 17.1(І), 731-733 [in Russian].

Gryzlov, B.V. (Ed.). (2003). Gubernii Rossiiskoi imperii. Istoriia i rukovoditeli. 1708-1917 [Provinces of the Russian Empire. History and Leaders. 1708-1917]. Moskva: Izdatelstvo: Obedinennaya redaktsiya MVD Rossii [in Russian].

Kavelin, S.P. (1914). Mezhevanie i zemleustroistvo. Teoreticheskoe i prakticheskoe rukovodstvo [Surveying and Land Management. Theoretical and Practical Guid]. Moskva: Izdanie magazina «Pravovedenie» I.K. Golubeva [in Russian].

Lobanova, A.A. (2013). Sistema podgotovki mezhevykh kadrov v Rossii v XIX – nachale XX vv. [The System of the Training of the Land Surveyores in Russia from XIX to the beginning of XX century]. Sibirskii pedagogicheskii zhurnal, 1, 50-53 [in Russian].

Malinovskii, F.L. (1844). Istoricheskii vzgliad na mezhevanie v Rossii do 1765 g. [Historical Perspective on the Surveying in Russia until 1765]. Sankt-Peterburg: Tipografiya A. Sycheva [in Russian].

Nekrasov, F.G. (1915). Mezhevanie zemel v Rossii: (Mezhevye zakony): Konspekt. [Land Surveying in Russia: (Surveying laws): Syllabus]. Moskva [in Russian].

Rulev, M.S. (2013). Reformy mezhevaniia i mezhevogo suda v XVIII veke: problemy i rezultaty [Reforms of the Surveying and the Surveying Court in the 18th century: Problems and Results]. Uchenye zapiski. Elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal Kurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 4 (28). URL: http://www.scientific-notes.ru/pdf/033-022.pdf [in Russian].

Smirnov, G.S., Smirnov, S.S. (2009). Organizatsiia generalnogo mezhevaniia v Rossii [Organization of General Land Surveying in Russia]. Sotsyum i vlast, 1 (21), 104-110 [in Russian].

Smirnov, G.S., Smirnov, S.S. (2010). Organizatsiia spetsialnogo mezhevaniia v Rossii [Organization of Special Land Surveying in Russia]. Sotsyum i vlast, 1 (25), 106-111 [in Russian].

Shevchuk, A.V. (2018). Borotba fiskaliv ta vlady za kontrol nad sudovoiu systemoiu Zakhidnykh hubernii Rosiiskoi imperii (1799 r.) [The Strife of Fiscal Inspectors and State Power for the Control of the Russian Empire Judicial System in Western Provinces (1799)]. Eminak: naukovyi shchokvartalnyk, 4 (24) (zhovten-hruden), Vol. 1, 82-86 [in Ukrainian].

Published
01.07.2019
How to Cite
Shevchuk, A. (2019). Podillia Provincial Ordinary Court of Appeal (1818-1840): Establishing, Staffing, and Social Portrait. EMINAK: Scientific Quarterly Journal, (2(26), 43-55. https://doi.org/10.33782/eminak2019.2(26).290
Section
History of Ukraine