Social and Economic Policy of the Romanian Administration in the Rural Area of Southwestern Ukraine in 1941-1944

Keywords: Transnistria, occupation, county, rural population, labour community, orders, tax

Abstract

The paper reveals the social and economic policy of the Romanian administration regarding the rural population in the interfluve of the Dniester and the Southern Buh in 1941-1944. One of the focal points of the Romanian occupation economic policy was the establishment of the agricultural sector of production, for which Directorate General for Agriculture was established. In order to reorganize the Soviet system of agricultural management, the Administration developed and introduced Order № 55, according to which the transformation of collective farms into «labour communities» took place. It has been found out that since the first days of occupation, the Romanian authorities impudently started to plunder the rural population. For the rural population, a number of taxes in kind were developed and introduced. For the needs of the invaders, villagers gave fleece, socks, mittens, and felt boots. According to Order №66, the peasants were obliged in the form of taxes to give milk, eggs, poultry, meat (pork, beef, mutton). Despite the existence of that order, besides taxes in kind, the peasants paid the money for land, cattle grazing and keeping dogs.

To ensure the fulfilment of all plans of the invaders aimed, in particular, at the most important – the continuity of agricultural products supply, several regulations that obliged all rural residents to work were introduced. The refusal of the population to execute all orders of the occupation authorities, including the refusal to go to work, could cause the infliction of various punishments from monetary fines to imprisonment. The Romanian authorities in the occupied lands of Southwestern Ukraine tried to save not only collective farms but also created by the Stalin authorities a pre-war system of remuneration of labour, «workday».

Agricultural workers got payment in kind. The peasants got those types of agricultural products, which were grown by «labour communities».

Such barbaric social and economic policy of the invaders placed the rural population in a very difficult position, condemning it to an impoverished existence.

References

Dallin, A. (1957). Odessa, 1941-1944: A Case Study of Soviet Territory Under Foreign Rule. California.

Deineka, N. (2013). Rumunskyi okupatsiinyi rezhym ta radianskyi rukh Oporu u pivdenno-zakhidnomu rehioni Ukrainy i Moldavii (1941-1944 rr.) [The Romanian occupation regime and the Soviet resistance movement in the southwestern region of Ukraine and Moldova (1941-1944)]. Odesa: Atlant [in Ukrainian].

Gratinich, S.A. (1985). Na levom beregu Dnestra. 1941 1944. Stranitsy sovmestnoi borby trudiashchikhsia smezhnykh raionov Moldavii i Ukrainy protiv nemetsko-rumynskikh fashistskikh zakhvatchikov [On the left bank of the Dniester. 1941-1944. Pages of the joint struggle of workers of adjacent regions of Moldova and Ukraine against the German-Romanian fascist invaders]. Kishinev: Kartia Moldoveniaske [in Russian].

Kulchitskyi, S. (ed.) (2012). Ukrainske radianske suspilstvo 30-kh rr. XX st.: narysy povsiakdennoho zhyttia [Ukrainian Soviet Society of the 1930’s. Essays of Everyday Life]. Kyiv: Instytut istorii Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].

Lebedev, N.I. (1976). Krakh fashizma v Rumynii [The collapse of fascism in Romania] Moskva: Nauka [in Russian].

Levchenko, Yu. (2013). Upravlinskyi aparat rumunskykh administratyvno-terytorialnykh odynyts Ukrainy pid chas okupatsii 1941-1944 rr. [The managerial unit of the Rumanian administrative and territorial office of Ukraine is at the time of repayment 1941-1944]. Naukovyi visnyk Skhidnoievropeiskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Lesi Ukrainky. Seriia: istorychni nauky, 21 (269), 70-75 [in Ukrainian].

Levit, I.E. (1981). Krakh politiki agressii diktatury Antonesku [Her Collapse of Antonescu’s Dictatorship Aggression Policy]. Kishinev: Shtiintsa [in Russian].

Levit, I.E. (1981). Uchastie fashistskoi Rumynii v agressii protiv SSSR. Istoki, plany realizatsiia [The participation of fascist Romania in the aggression against the USSR. Origins, plans, implementation]. Kishinev: Shtiintsa [in Russian].

Mykhailutsa, M.I. (2008). Pravoslavna tserkva na Pivdni Ukrainy v roky Druhoi svitovoi viiny (1939-1945) [Orthodox Church in the South of Ukraine during the Second World War (1939-1945)]. Odesa: VMV [in Ukrainian].

Mykhailutsa, M.I. (2015). Rekonstruktsiia diialnosti Domanivskoho protoiiereistva Holtianskoho povitu v period rumunskoi okupatsii (1941-1944 rr.) [Reconstruction of the work of the Domaine Archpriest of the Holtan County during the Romanian occupation (1941-1944)]. Kraeznavstvo, 1-2, 184-189 [in Ukrainian].

Nitochko, I.I. (2008). Okupatsiia: Berezivskyi raion. 1941-1944 rr. [Occupation: Berezivsky district. 1941-1944]. Odesa: Astroprynt [in Ukrainian].

Odessa: zhizn v okkupatsii 1941-1944. Istoriia kollaboratsionizma (2013) [Odessa: life in the occupation. 1941-1944. History of collaborationism]. Moskva: Politicheskaia entsyklopediia [in Russian].

Odesskaia oblast v Velikoi Otechestvennoi voine 1941-1945 gg. (1970) [Odessa region in the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945]. Odessa : Maiak [in Russian].

Osypenko, O. (2018). Methods of «stimulating» the work of a rural worker in «Transnistria», 1941-1944. Storinky voiennoi istorii Ukrainy, 20, 173-183 [in Ukrainian].

Osypenko, O.V. (2018). Silske naselennia ta «Trudovi hromady» Pivdnia Ukrainy v hubernatorstvi «Transnistriia» 1941-1944 rr.: sotsialno-istorychnyi aspekt [Rural population and «Labor communities» of the South of Ukraine in the governorate «Transnistria» 1941-1944: socio-historical aspect]. (Extended abstract of Candidate’s thesis). Mykolaiv [in Ukrainian].

Perekhrest, O.H. (2010). Silske hospodarstvo Ukrainy v roky Velykoi Vitchyznianoi viiny (1941-1945 rr.) [Agriculture of Ukraine during the Great Patriotic War (1941-1945)]. Kyiv: Instytut istorii Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].

Rekotov, P.V. (1997). Orhany upravlinnia na okupovanii terytorii Ukrainy (1941-1944 rr.) [Governments in the Occupied Territory of Ukraine (1941-1944)]. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal, 3, 90-101 [in Ukrainian].

Shchetnikov, V.P. (2012). Ekonomichna skladova rumunsko-nimetskoi prysutnosti v «Transnistrii» 1941-1944 rr. [The economic component of the Romanian-German presence in Transnistria 1941-1944]. Storinky voiennoi istorii Ukrainy, 15, 173-188 [in Ukrainian].

Solovei, R. (2004). Activitatea Guvernamintului Transnistriei on domeniul social-economic si cultural: (19 auq. 1941 – 29 ian. 1944). Iasi [in Moldova].

Tarnavskyi, I.S. (2010). Administratyvnyi podil ta orhany upravlinnia na terytorii pivdenno-zakhidnoi Ukrainy za chasiv rumunskoi okupatsii [Administrative division and government in the territory of southwestern Ukraine during the Romanian occupation]. Istorychni i politolohichni doslidzhennia, 3-4, 210-216 [in Ukrainian].

Tarnavskyi, I.S. (2012). Polityka Tretoho reikhu ta yoho soiuznykiv na okupovanykh ukrainskykh zemliakh v roky Druhoi svitovoi viiny [Politics of the Third Reich and its allies in the occupied Ukrainian lands during the Second World War]. Donetsk: TOV «VPP «PROMIN» [in Ukrainian].

Vintskovskii, T., Kiazymova, G., Mykhailutsa, M. & Schetnikov, V. (2010). Okupatsiinyi rezhym v hubernatorstvi «Transnistriia» [Occupation regime in the Transnistrian province]. In Ukraina u Druhii svitovii viini: pohliad z XXI st. Istorychni narysy. Vol. 1. Kyiv: Naukova dumka (pp. 413-446) [in Ukrainian].

Zhukovskyi, A. (1987). Ukrainski zemli pid rumunskoiu okupatsiieiu v chasy Druhoi svitovoi viiny : Pivnichna Bukovyna, chastyna Bessarabii i Transnistrii [Ukrainian lands under Romanian occupation during the Second World War: Northern Bukovina, part of Bessarabia and Transnistria]. Ukrainskyi istoryk, 1-4, 83-96 [in Ukrainian].

Published
01.07.2019
How to Cite
OsypenkoO. (2019). Social and Economic Policy of the Romanian Administration in the Rural Area of Southwestern Ukraine in 1941-1944. Eminak: Scientific Quarterly Journal, (2(26), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.33782/eminak2019.2(26).294
Section
History of Ukraine