Features of Formation and Use of Leased Land Resource in Katerynoslav Province in Post-Reform Period

Keywords: land lease, Katerynoslav Province, entrepreneurship, land use, sharecropping

Abstract

The process of formation and development of lease relations in the agricultural sector of Katerynoslav Province (hubernia) in the post-reform period is studied in the paper. The reasons for the widespread distribution of land lease and the specifics of the process in different counties (povits) of the province are analyzed. The role of landownership in the formation of the land lease fund of the region is determined. Huge agricultural areas served as a significant source of productive and non-productive income for the local nobility. Few owners of capitalist-type estates used the funds gained from the land lease to modernize their agricultural production. For the vast majority of nobles, a land lease was the main way of land use.

The methods of involving the peasantry of Katerynoslav region, both individually and in collective forms, in the land lease relations in the conditions of peasantry property and social differentiation are specified. Attention is focused on the fact that the main tenant was a wealthy peasantry, who used the land primarily for the establishment of commercial agriculture.

The type differentiation of the lands that made up the lease fund of the region is carried out. It has been found out that the majority were privately owned, as well as peasants’ plots of land, lands of the treasury, and private institutions. The specific character of land lease for coal mining in Katerynoslav Province is shown.

A wide range of statistical sources is processed to highlight the types of land lease and regional features of their application. The popular form of the land lease was sharecropping, but in the areas of commercial agriculture, there was a dynamic development of money land lease, common to capitalist management.

The dynamics of changes in lease prices in the context of types of land lease and regional differentiation are traced. The advantages and disadvantages of land lease for owners and tenants of the province are highlighted. The conclusion is made about the important place of land lease in the entrepreneurial activity of Katerynoslav nobility and peasantry as the primary subjects of land lease relations and producers of agricultural products. It promoted the development of entrepreneurial initiatives and the intensification of capitalist forms of management in the village.

References

Anfimov, A.M. (1961). Zemelnaia arenda v Rossii v nachale XX veka [Land lease in Russia in the early of the 20th century]. Moskva: Izdatelstvo AN SSSR [in Russian].

Balukhtina, O.M. (2013). Rozvytok orendy na tserkovnykh zemliakh Pivdennoi Ukrainy (2-ha polovyna XIX st. – 1917 r.) [Development of lease on Church’s lands of Southern Ukraine (2nd half of XIX century – 1917)]. Istorychnyi arkhiv. Naukovi studii, 10, 16-24 [in Ukrainian].

Chernikova, N.S. (2020). Osoblyvosti stanovlennia ta rozvytku orendnykh vidnosyn u Tavriiskii hubernii (2-ha pol. 19 st. – 1917 r.) [Features of formation and development of lease relations in Tavriya province (2nd half of XIX century – 1917)]. Grani, 23 (3), 155-174 [in Ukrainian].

Chernikova, N.S. (2020). Zemelna orenda v Khersonskii hubernii: osoblyvosti rozvytku v umovakh kapitalistychnykh zrushen [Land rent in Kherson province: features of development in the conditions of capitalistic shifts]. Gileya, 156 (5), 136-147 [in Ukrainian].

Fleksor, D.S. (1903). Arenda. Svod trudov mestnyh komitetov po 49 gubernijam Evropejskoj Rossii [Rent. Proceedings of local committees in 49 provinces of European Russia]. Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].

Ivanov, L.M. (1961). O kapitalisticheskoi i otrabotochnoi sistemakh v selskom hoziaistve pomeshchikov na Ukraine v kontse 19 v. [About the capitalist and developmental systems in the agriculture of landowners in Ukraine at the end of the nineteenth century]. In: Voprosy istorii selskogo hoziaistva, krestianstva i revoliutsionnogo dvizheniia v Rossii, (pp. 312-337). Moskva: AN SSSR [in Russian].

Karyshev, N.A. (1897). Krestianskie vnenadelnyie arendy v zavisimosti ot kolebanii khlebnykh tsen i urozhaev [Peasant extra-lease rents depending on fluctuations in grain prices and yields]. In: Chuprov, A.I, Posnikov, A.S. (Eds.). Vliianie khlebnykh tsen i urozhaev na nekotorye storony russkogo narodnogo khoziaistva (pp. 277-377). Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].

Kaufman, A.A. (1918). Agrarnyi vopros v Rossii: kurs narodnogo universiteta [The agrarian question in Russia: course of the people’s university]. Moskva [in Russian].

Los, F.Ye. (1944). Zaprovadzhennia ahrarnoi polityky Stolypina na Ukraini [Implementation of Stolypin’s agricultural policy in Ukraine]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].

Manuilov, A.A. (1905). Arenda zemli v Rossii v ekonomicheskom otnoshenii [Land lease in Russia in economic terms] In: Manuilov, A.A. (Ed.). Ocherki po krestianskomu voprosu (pp. 72-204). Moskva: Izdanie D.S. Gorshkova [in Russian].

Ostrovskiy, A.V. (2016). Rossiiskaia derevnia na istoricheskom pereputie. Konets XIX – nachalo XX v. [Russian village at a historic crossroads. The end of the XIX – early of the XX century]. Moskva [in Russian].

Pohrebynskyi, O. (1931). Stolypinska reforma na Ukraini [Stolypin reform in Ukraine]. Kharkiv: Vydavnytstvo «Proletar» [in Ukrainian].

Postnikov, V.E. (1891). Yuzhno-russkoe krestianskoe khoziaistvo [South Russian peasant economy]. Moskva [in Russian].

Pryimak, O.M. (2002). Stolypinska ahrarna reforma na Pivdni Ukrainy (1906-1917 rr.) [Stolypin Agrarian Reform in the South of Ukraine (1906-1917)]. Zaporizhzhia: Tandem-U [in Ukrainian].

Reient, O.P., Serdiuk, O.V. (2011). Silske hospodarstvo Ukrainy i svitovyi prodovolchyi rynok (1861-1914 rr.). [Ukraine’s agriculture and the World Food market (1861-1914)]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Temirova, N.R. (1998). Pomishchytske zemlevolodinnia ta zemlekorystuvannia na pivdni Ukrainy u poreformenyi period [Land tenure and land use in the South of Ukraine in the post-reform period]. Zapysky naukovo-doslidnoi laboratorii istorii Pivdennoi Ukrainy Zaporizkoho derzhavnoho universytetu: Pivdenna Ukraina XVIII-XIX stolittia, (3), 135-142 [in Ukrainian].

Temirova, N.R. (2003). Pomishchyky Ukrainy v 1861-1917 rr.: sotsialno-ekonomichna evoliutsiia [Landowners of Ukraine in 1861-1917: Socio-Economic Evolution]. Donetsk: DonNU [in Ukrainian].

Teplytskyi, V.P. (1959). Reforma 1861 roku i ahrarni vidnosyny na Ukraini (60-90-ti rr. XIX st.) [Reform of 1861 and agrarian relations in Ukraine (60-90’s of the XIX century)]. Kyiv: Vydavnytstvo AN URSR [in Ukrainian].

Vasil’iev, V.A. (1913). Khoziaistvo deistvitelnogo statskogo sovetnika Ye.K. Brodskogo, zemlevladeltsa Verkhnedneprovskogo uezda Ekaterinoslavskoi gubernii [The economy of the current state adviser E.K. Brodsky, landowner of the Verkhnedneprovsky district of the Ekaterinoslav province]. Ekaterinoslav [in Russian].

Yakymenko, M.A. (1991). Zemelna orenda na Ukraini v period kapitalizmu [Land lease in Ukraine during the period of capitalism]. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal, 2, 54-63 [in Ukrainian].

Zaikin, F.O. (1900). Opisanie chastnovladelcheskikh khoziaistv Ananievskogo uezda [Description of private property farms of Ananievsky district]. Kherson [in Russian].

Published
01.10.2020
How to Cite
ChernikovaN. (2020). Features of Formation and Use of Leased Land Resource in Katerynoslav Province in Post-Reform Period. Eminak: Scientific Quarterly Journal, (3(31), 43-61. https://doi.org/10.33782/eminak2020.3(31).435
Section
History of Ukraine