Donetsk Basin Mining Engineers Memoirs of Second Half of 19th – Early 20th Century: Professional Aspect

Keywords: Donbas, memoirs, mining engineers, mine, miners, coal deposits, industrial development

Abstract

The information potential of the memoirs of mining engineers O. Auerbach, O. Fenin, O. Terpyhoriev, who worked at the mines of Donbas in the second half of the 19th – early 20th century is analyzed in the paper.

Memories as memoirs, in fact, are constructed on several levels: personal/autobiographical, professional, historical. The professional component, especially if a person is characterized by active professional activity, often prevails, based on collective discourse. Under the influence of life experience, changes in society, profession, political situation, a certain aberration of the author’s personal interpretation of the past takes place. Therefore, the memoirist becomes dependent on the views contemporary to the writing of memoirs.

It is noted that the analyzed memoirs contain a sizeable amount of professional information, including technical characteristics of coal deposits and mines, the organization of mining, information about colleagues and entrepreneurs with an emphasis on professional qualities, rather long stories about miners. This information is intertwined with the personal interpretation of the realities of rapidly developing industrial region, in particular, working and living conditions, relationships with colleagues and miners.

Peculiarities of biographies and conditions of memoirs creation caused differences in interpretation of the historical context and description of common professional situations. O. Auerbach focuses on his professional activities, thus telling about the mines he worked at and the people he interacted with. In addition to his professional activity, O. Fenin, along with describing his professional activities, pays much attention to the people he had to work with. For him, it is part of a lost world. In O. Terpyhoriev’s memoirs, technical information absolutely prevails. The prevailing theme of his memoirs is a comparison of pre-revolutionary and socialist Donbas. At the same time, all authors have an understanding of their work significance and a sense of involvement in powerful industrialized construction, which became the motive for writing memoirs.

References

Auerbakh, A. (1909). Vospominaniia o nachale razvitiia kamennougolnoi promyshlennosti v Rossii [Memories of the beginning of the development coal industry in Russia]. Russkaia starina, Vol. 138 (6), 451-472; Vol. 140 (12), 546-562 [in Russian].

Cherkushina, Yu. & Peretokin, A. (2009). A.A. Auerbakh predstavitel regionalnogo inzhenernogo predprinimatelstva vtoroi poloviny XIX – nachala XX vv. [A.A. Auerbach is a representative of the regional engineering entrepreneurship of the second half of the 19th – early 20th centuries]. Gumanitarnyi zhurnal, 1-2 (40-41), 84-91 [in Russian].

Cherkushyna, Yu. & Peretokin, A. (2013). Promyslovyi rozvytok ta inzhenerne pidpryiemnytstvo Donetsko-Prydniprovskoho rehionu (1880-1917 rr.) [Industrial development and engineering entrepreneurship of the Donetsk-Prydniprovsk region (1880-1917)]. Dnipropetrovsk: NHU [in Ukrainian].

Chornobai, P. (2010). Formuvannia tekhnichnoi intelihentsii na Katerynoslavshchyni naprykintsi XIX – na pochatku XX st. [The Formation of Science Intelligentsia in Katerinoslavschyna at the End of the 19th – early 20th century]. (Extended abstract of Candidate’s thesis). Dnipropetrovsk [in Ukrainian].

Fenin, A. (1938). Vospominaniia inzhenera. K istorii obshchestvennogo i khoziaistvennogo razvitiia Rossii (1883-1906 gg.) [Memoirs of an Engineer: On the History of Social and Economic Development of Russia (1883-1906)]. Praga: Russkii institut v Prage [in Russian].

Fenin, A. (N.d.). Vospominaniia inzhenera. Chast II [Memories of an Engineer. Part II]. Retrieved from https://prozhito.org/memories?diaries=[8108] [in Russian].

Ilchenko, M. & etc. (2018). Pratsia, vysnazhennia ta uspikh: promyslovi monomista Donbasu [Labor, exhaustion and success: industrial monocities of Donbass]. Lviv: Tsentr miskoi istorii [in Ukrainian].

Khalbvaks, M. (2007). Sotsialnye ramki pamiati [Social frameworks of memory]. Moskva: Novoe izdatelstvo [in Russian].

Kulikov, V. (2019). Pidpryemstva i suspilstvo v zavodskykh i shakhtarskykh poselenniakh Donbasu ta Prydniprovia v 1870-1917 rr. [Промисловий розвиток та інженерне підприємництво Донецько-Придніпровського регіону (1880-1917 рр.)]. Kharkiv: KhNU imeni V.N. Karazina [in Ukrainian].

Kuromiia, H. (2002). Svoboda i teror v Donbasi: Ukrainsko-rosiiske prykordonnia, 1870-1990-ti roky [Freedom and Terror in the Donbas: A Ukrainian-Russian Borderland, 1870s-1990s]. Kyiv: «Osnovy» [in Ukrainian].

Nikolaiets, Yu. (2012). Poselenska struktura naselennia Donbasu: (etnopolitychnyi aspekt dynamiky) [Settlement structure of the population of Donbass: (ethnopolitical aspect of dynamics)]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Rozentreter, B. (1965). Aleksandr Mitrofanovich Terpigorev. 1873-1959. Ocherk zhyzni i deiatelnosti [Alexander Mitrofanovich Terpigorev. 1873-1959. Essay on life and work]. Moskva: Nauka [in Russian].

Shvydko, H. (2014). Katerynoslavshchyna pochatku XX st. u spohadakh vchenykh [Katerynoslavshchyna early XX century in the memoirs of scientists]. Istoriia i kultura Prydniprovia. Nevidomi ta malovidomi storinky, 11, 68-82 [in Ukrainian].

Stark, J. (2018). British and American Diplomatic Memoirs as Factual Narratives: A Resource for the Linguistic and Cultural Analysis of the Specialised Domain of Diplomacy. ILCEA, 31. Retrieved from http://journals.openedition.org/ilcea/4680. DOI: 10.4000/ilcea.4680

Tartakovskii, A. (1999) Memuaristika kak fenomen kultury [Memoiristics as a cultural phenomenon]. Voprosy literatury, 1, 37-54 [in Russian].

Terpigorev, A. (1956). Vospominaniia gornogo inzhenera [Memoirs of a mining engineer]. Moskva: Izd. AN SSSR [in Russian].

Published
01.07.2021
How to Cite
OtzemkoO. (2021). Donetsk Basin Mining Engineers Memoirs of Second Half of 19th – Early 20th Century: Professional Aspect. Eminak: Scientific Quarterly Journal, (2(34), 277-287. https://doi.org/10.33782/eminak2021.2(34).534
Section
Historiography, Source Study and Special Historical Disciplines