Spravnyk in Volyn Province Administrative System (end of the 18th century – 1860s)
Abstract
The purpose of the paper is to describe the functioning of the spravnyk (province superintendent of police) institution in Volyn province since the end of the 18th century and till the reform of local police in 1862; to characterize their powers, to determine the peculiarities of personnel policy of appointments for that position, to characterize the practical activity of spravnyks.
Scientific novelty. The specific functions of the spravnyks of Volyn province, which provided stability on the newly annexed territories, are analyzed and the analysis of their full-time personnel and the duration of their stay in a position is made. Conclusions about the flexible personnel policy of the supreme power in the region are made: with the necessity of obtaining the loyalty of local elites, the opportunity to form the spravnyk institution independently was given to them, but in the case of stabilizing the situation – the supreme power returned to the bureaucratic principle.
Conclusions: The functioning of the spravnyk institution in Volyn province in the 18th – the 1860s is analyzed. The assuming by them of administrative, economic, fiscal, and police powers in the povit and participation in the Lower Zemstvo Court is studied. It is noted that, unlike the inner provinces of the Russian Empire, the spravnyks also provided political stability. The supreme power relied on the opinion of the spravnyks to determine the reliability of the gentry; they issued permits to travel outside the povit to those Poles who were under investigation; they made reports on compliance with inventory rules in Polish estates, etc. Spravnyks had got exceptional independent powers to call the troops to suppress the rebellions.
Given the importance of the powers of the spravnyks, the supreme power only in critical cases allowed the election of officials, which put them in dependence on the local nobility (1802-1805, 1816-1823). In the rest of the periods, the corps of spravnyks was formed on a bureaucratic principle. The top for the officials was the rank of the titular counselor, and for the service, they were awarded orders. Their rotations between the povits were traditional. After the Polish November Uprising, the gentry lost the opportunity to take that position, and the final decision to appoint spravnyks was transferred to the Ministry of Internal Affairs. Military retirees started to be assigned that position, who, according to the authorities, could better cope with the tasks of supervising the Poles. Instead, their inability to carry out administrative and economic powers, record keeping, etc. quickly became obvious. The former military regarded the service as an opportunity to enrich themselves quickly and illegally, which nullified the efforts of the supreme power to accelerate the integration of the region.
References
Barmak, M. & Barmak, O. (2011). Osoblyvosti evoliutsii politsiinykh orhaniv u huberniiakh Pravoberezhnoi Ukrainy v pershii polovyni ХІХ st. [Features of the evolution of police bodies in the provinces of the Right Bank of Ukraine in the first half of the 19th century]. Naukovi zapysky Ternopilskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni Volodymyra Hnatiuka. Seriia Istoriia, 1, 4-12. [in Ukrainian].
Bortnikov, V. & Bortnikova, A. (2021). Osoblyvosti formuvannia orhaniv dvorianskoho samovriaduvannia Volynskoi hub. (kinets ХVІІІ – 30-ti roky ХІХ st.) [The Peculiarities of the Nobility Self-Government Bodies Formation in Volyn Province (Late 18th cent. – 1830’s)]. Storinky istorii, 52, 48-59. DOI: 10.20535/2307-5244.52.2021.236149 [in Ukrainian].
Gorak, A. (2006). Kancelaria Gubernatora i Rząd Gubernialny Lubelski (1867-1918) [Office of Governor and Province Lubelski (1867-1918)]. Lublin-Radzyń Podaski [in Polish].
Gradovskiy, A. (1908). Nachala russkogo gosudarstvennogo prava [The Beginnings of Russian State law] Sobranie sochineniy. Tom 9. Organy mestnogo upravleniya [Local authorities]. Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].
Grigoriev, V. (1910). Reforma mestnogo upravleniya pri Ekaterine II (Uchrezhdenie o guberniyah 1775 g.) [Reform of local government under Catherine II (The Governorate reform of 1775)]. Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].
Hrukach, V. (2015). Instytut gheneral-hubernatorstva u Pravoberezhnii Ukraini: pravovi zasady ta osoblyvosti funktsionuvannia (1832-1914 rr.) [Governor-General Institution in the Right Bank Ukraine: legal principles and features of functioning (1832-1914)]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Ignatieva, K. (2017). Ispolnitelnaya politsiya Rossiyskoy imperii v 1862-1905 gg.: sistema organov i osnovnye napravleniya deyatelnosti [The executive police of the Russian Empire in 1862-1905: the system of organs and the main activities]. Nauchnyy dialog. Molodoy uchenyy, 26-30. DOI: 10.18411/spc-22-12-2017-08 [in Russian].
Khramtsov, A (2017). Uezdnyie ispravniki v Sibirskom regione: k sotsialnomu portretu [District Police Officers in the Siberian Region: to the Social Portrait]. Bylye gody, 1, 200-208. DOI: 10.13187/bg.2017.1.200 [in Russian].
Krashevskii, Y.I (1874). Rasskazy o polskoi starine: zapiski XVIII veka, pereisdannye i izdannye Y.I. Krashevskim [Stories about Polish old time: notes of the 18th century, rewritten and published by Y.I. Krashevskii]. Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].
Liutina, E. (2013). Nizhniy zemskiy sud Kirenskogo uezda [Nizhny Zemsky Court of Kirensky Uyezd]. Sbornik trudov Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Sedmye Baykalskie mezhdunarodnye socialno-gumanitarnye chteniya, 3, 20-23 [in Russian].
Malakhov, A. (2013). Rol zemskikh i uezdnykh ispravnikov v upravlenii Rostovskim uezdom Yaroslavskoy gubernii 1777-1917 gg. [The role of zemstvo and district police officers in the management of the Rostov district of the Yaroslavl province in 1777-1917.]. Istoriya i kultura Rostovskoy zemli, 103-124 [in Russian].
Mamaev, N. (1901). Zapiski [Notes]. Istoricheskiy vestnik, 86, pp. 46-72, 428-470, 864-883 [in Russian].
Markevych, O. (2021). Diialnist volynskoi hubernskoi administratsii po orhanizatsii borotby z epidemiiamy naprykintsi ХVІІІ – pershii polovyni ХІХ st. [Аctivity of Volyn provincial administration in organizing measure against epidemics at the end of the 18th – the first half of the 19th century]. Litopys Volyni, 25, 15-21. DOI: 10.32782/2305-9389/2021.25.02 [in Ukrainian].
Pravikov, F. (1806). Pamyatnik iz zakonov, rukovodstvuyushchiy k poznaniyu dolzhnostey, vozlozhennye na mesta i na obretayushchikh v nikh sobrannykh trudam [Extracts from the laws, leading to the knowledge of the positions assigned to the places and to those who find in them the collected works]. Moskva: Senatskaya tipografiya u S. Selivanovskago [in Russian].
Shandra, V. (2012). Spravnyk [Police officer]. In Entsyklopediia istorii Ukrainy (Vol. 9, pp. 774-775). Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].
Shevchuk, A. (2021). Povitovi ta holovni sudy Pravoberezhnoi Ukrainy (1797-1831 rr.): ulashtuvannia, kadrovyi sklad, diialnist [District and main courts in Right-Bank Ukraine (1797-1831): arrangement, staffing and activities]. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal, 4, 50-64. DOI: 10.15407/uhj2021.04.050 [in Ukrainian].
Sinelnikov, N. (1895). Zapiski senatora [Senator’s notes]. Istoricheskii vestnik, 60, 380-397 [in Russian].
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.