Internal and External ‘Enemies’ as Means of Consolidating Russians in Struggle for Status of International Leadership of Russian Empire in the Middle of the 19th century
Abstract
The purpose of the paper is to study the role of the ‘threat of enemies’ factor as certain technologies in the politics of Russian elites, in order to feed stable sentiments of ‘blind patriotism’ in the society, and the use of the latter in geopolitical claims to the status of a ‘great power’.
Scientific novelty: based on documentary sources it is found out that introducing manipulative technologies to influence the consciousness of Russians through periodicals and literature, dates back to the middle of the 19th century, and the main incentive for the ‘patriotic rallying’ of all strata of Russian society for the full approval of the ‘native government’ policy had become the artificial formation of the notion about ‘life danger’ due to the ‘threat of enemies’.
Conclusions. Experience of the history of the first half – the middle of the 19th century shows (the same happened in the middle – the second half of the 20th century) that significant military victories of the Russians each time prompted them to claim global geopolitical influence; and vice versa, when the precedent of a significant military defeat was set, their intellectual elite resorted to self-exposure of shameful national traits and the confession of their imperialistic aspirations. Despite the persistent social and political feature of the Russian reality – the excessive level of power centralization – during periods of softening of totalitarian pressure and repressive massacres, the need to maintain the public sentiment of ‘unity and trust’ between the ruling power and the people always remained unchanged.
It was just in the middle of the 19th century, during the weakening of the autocracy’s authority (as a result of the Crimean War), that the technology of influencing the Russian educated public was invented with the establishment of a system of so-called ‘trusted’ periodicals. And with the efforts of the latter, the desired goal was achieved – shifting the public’s attention from the internal problems of the empire’s system to the problems of ‘perceived external threats.’
Organized in periodicals, the campaign of a manipulatively created image of ‘enemies threatening the fatherland’ quickly removed all claims expressed to the imperial authorities and formed the atmosphere of ‘patriotic’ readiness to unite with the same authorities in the fight against ‘declared enemies’. Permanently cultivated convictions that the empire and the fatherland were identical concepts also served as an additional catalyst for arousing mass sentiments of ‘blind patriotism’ among Russians. Therefore, all the conquests of the Empire were inseparable components of the ‘Russian national body’, and their defense in the struggle was the ‘holy’ duty of every ‘patriot’.
References
Adamczewski, P. (2018). Russia and the Caucasus in the Polish Ethnopolitical Myth. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 88, 405-412. DOI: 10.1134/S1019331618040093 [in English].
Bakunin, M.A. (1962). Russkim, polskim i vsem slavianskim druziam [To Russian, Polish and all Slavic friends]. Kolokol, list 122/123, 15 fevralia 1862 g. Kolokol. Moskva, p. 1022 [in Russian].
Barsukov, N. (1888-1910). Zhizn i trudy M.P. Pogodina [Life and works of M.P. Pogodin]. Sankt-Peterburg: Tipografiia M.M. Stasiulevicha [in Russian].
BBC NEWS (2022, June 10). Путін порівняв себе з Петром І. Чому це розцінили як зізнання в загарбанні України [Putin compared himself to Peter I. Why was this seen as a confession of the annexation of Ukraine]. BBC NEWS. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/features-61757187 [in Ukrainian].
Burtsev, V.L. (Ed.). (1906). Proklamatsii 60-kh godov [Proclamations of the 60s]. Byloe, 2, 126-133 [in Russian].
Chernyshevskii, N.G. (1950). Natsionalnaia bestaktnost [National faux pas]. In Polnoe sobranie sochinenii v 15 tomakh. T. VII: Stati i retsenzii. 1860-1861, (pp. 775-793). Moskva: Goslitizdat [in Russian].
Chernyshevskii, N.G. (1950). Novye periodicheskie izdaniia. Osnova, 1861, № 1 [New periodicals. Osnova, 1861, No. 1]. In Polnoe sobranie sochinenii v 15 tomakh. T. VII: Stati i retsenzii. 1860-1861, (pp. 934-948). Moskva: Goslitizdat [in Russian].
Chicherin, B.N. (2001). Vospominaniia [Memories]. Moskva-Minsk [in Russian].
Debidur, A. (1947). Diplomaticheskaia istoriia Evropy: ot Venskogo do Berlinskogo kongressa (1814-1878) [Diplomatic History of Europe: From the Congress of Vienna to the Berlin Congress (1814-1878)]. Vol. 2: Revoliutsiia. Moskva [in Russian].
Delvig, A.I. (1930). Polveka russkoi zhizni. Vospominaniia A.I. Delviga. 1820-1870 [Half a century of Russian life. Memoirs of A.I. Delvig. 1820-1870] Moskva-Leningrad [in Russian].
Feoktistov, E. (1991). Za kulisami politiki i literatury (1848-1896). Vospominaniia [Behind the Scenes of Politics and Literature (1848-1896). Memoirs]. Moskva: Novosti [in Russian].
Firsov, S.L. (Ed.). (1996). Pobedonostsev: pro et contra [Pobedonostsev: pro et contra]. Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].
Gertsen, A.I. & Ogarev, N.P. (Ed.). (1962). Kolokol [Bell]. Newspaper of A.I. Gerzen and N.P. Ogarev. Moscow [in Russian].
Głębocki, H. (2006). Irredenta polska a “kresy” imperium. Powstanie Styczniowe (1863-1864) a ewolucja polityki imperium Rosyjskiego wobec jego zachodnich “okrain”. In Nowak, Andrzej (Ed.). Rosja i Europa wschodnia: imperiologia stosowana. Kraków, pp. 306-350 [in Poland].
Katkov, M.N. (1897). Polskii vopros v Zapadnom krae mozhet byt razreshen tolko raskrytiem nashei sily. Sobranie peredovykh statei Moskovskikh vedomostei 1863 goda [The Polish question in the Western Territory can only be resolved by revealing our strength. Collection of leading articles of the ‘Moscovskie Vedomosti’]. Moskva [in Russian].
Katkov, M.N. (1887). 1863 god. Sobranie statei po Polskomu voprosu, pomeshchavshikhsia v Moskovskikh vedomostiakh, Russkom vestnike i Sovremennoi letopisi (vypusk pervyi) [1863. Collection of articles on the Polish question, placed in the ‘Moskovskie Vedomosti’, ‘Russkiy vestnik’ and ‘Sovremennaya letopis’ (Issue One)]. Moskva [in Russian].
Kornilov, A.A. (1909). Obshchestvennoe dvizhenie pri Aleksandre II (1855-1881). Istoricheskie ocherki [Social movement under Alexander II (1855-1881). Historical essays]. Moskva [in Russian].
Korsakov, D.A. (1899). Iz zhizni K.D. Kavelina vo Frantsii i Germanii v 1862-1864 gg. (po ego perepiske v eto vremia) [From the life of K.D. Kavelin in France and Germany in 1862-1864 (according to his correspondence at that time)]. Russkaia mysl, XI, 1-20 [in Russian].
Kostomarov, N. (1861). Dve russkie narodnosti (Pismo k redaktoru) [Two Russian nationalities (Letter to the Editor)]. Osnova, Mart, XVI, 33-80 [in Russian].
Lemke, M. (1904). Epokha tsenzurnykh reform 1859-1865 godov [The era of censorship reforms. 1859-1865]. Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].
Lieven, D. (2005). Imperiia, istoriia i sovremennyi mirovoi poriadok [Empire, History and the Modern World Order]. Ab imperio, 1, 75-116. DOI: 10.1353/imp.2005.0035 [in Russian].
Miller, A.I. (2000). “Ukrainskii vopros” v politike vlastei i russkom obshchestvennom mnenii (vtoraia polovina XIX v.) [“The Ukrainian Question” in the Politics of the Authorities and Russian Public Opinion (second half of the 19th century)]. Sankt-Peterbugr: Aleteiia [in Russian].
Nevedenskii, S. (1888). Katkov i ego vremia [Katkov and his time]. Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].
Nikitenko, A.V. (1955). Dnevnik [Diary]. Vol. 2: 1858-1865. Leningrad [in Russian].
Nolde, B.E. (1978). Yurii Samarin i ego vremia [Yuri Samarin and his time]. Parizh: YMCA-Press [in Russian].
Nowak, W. (2005). Terror wobec ludności cywilnej Królestwa Polskiego i Ziem Zabranych stosowany przez oddziały i żandarmerię powstańczą w latach 1863-1864. In Caban, Wiesław & Śliwowska, Wiktoria (Eds.). Powstanie Styczniowe 1863-1864. Walka i uczestnicy. Represji i wygnanie. Historiografia i tradycja. Kielce: Wydaw-wo Akademii Świętokrzyskiej, pp. 41-54 [in Poland].
Muraviev, M.N. (1882). Zapiski ego ob upravlenii Severo-Zapadnym kraem i ob usmirenii v nem miatezha. 1863-1866 [His notes on the management of the North-Western Territory and the suppression of the rebellion in it. 1863-1866]. Russkaia starina, Noiabr, 405 [in Russian].
Pipes, R. (1993). Rossiia pri starom rezhime [Russia under the Old Regime]. Moskva: “Nezavisimaia gazeta” [in Russian].
Panteleev, L.F. (1958). Vospominaniia [Memories]. Moskva [in Russian].
Petukhova, A. (2010). “Skazhi mne, kto tvoi vrag…”: “antifinliandskii diskurs” v prostranstve obshchestvenno-politicheskoi kommunikatsii Rossiiskoi imperii kontsa XIX – nachala XX vv. [“Tell me who your enemy is...”: “antipinsky discourse” in the space of social-political communications of the Russian empire of late XIX – early XX centuries]. Ab imperio, 3, 195-226. DOI: 10.1353/imp.2010.0072 [in Russian].
Pearson, R. (2003). Privilegii, prava i russifikatsiia [Privileges, Rights, and Russification]. Ab imperio, 3, 35-56. DOI: 10.1353/imp.2003.0045 [in Russian].
Pivovarov, Yu.S. (2006). Russkaia politika v ee istoricheskom i kulturnom otnosheniiakh [Russian politics in its historical and cultural relations]. Moskva [in Russian].
Pogodin, M.P. (1868). Polskii vopros [The Polish Question]. In Sobranie rassuzhdenii, zapisok i zamechanii. 1831-1867. Moskva, pp. 77-98 [in Russian].
Revunenkov, V.G. (1957). Polskoe vosstanie 1863 g. i evropeiskaia diplomatiia [The Polish uprising of 1863 and European diplomacy]. Leningrad [in Russian].
Sakulin, P.N. (2001). Russkaia literatura 60-kh godov. Istoriia Rossii v XIX veke: Epokha reform [Russian literature of the 1860s. History of Russia in the 19th century: the era of reforms]. Moskva [in Russian].
Seniavskaia, E.S. (2006). Protivniki Rossii v voinakh XX veka: Evoliutsiia “obraza vraga” v soznanii armii i obshchestva [Opponents of Russia in the wars of the 20th century: the evolution of the “image of enemy” in the minds of the army and society]. Moskva: ROSSPEN [in Russian].
Seredonin, S.M. (1902). Istoricheskii obzor deiatelnosti Komiteta ministrov [Historical overview of the activities of the Committee of Ministers]. Vol. 3 (2). Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].
Suny, R. (2001). Imperiia kak ona est: imperskaia Rossiia, “natsionalnoe” samosoznanie i teorii imperii [Empire As It Is: Imperial Russia, “National” Self-Consciousness, and Theories of Empire]. Аb imperio, 1/2, 9-72. DOI: 10.1353/imp.2001.0021 [in Russian].
Taylor, Alan John Percivale (1958). Borba za gospodstvo v Evrope. 1848-1918 [The Struggle for Mastery in Europe. 1848-1918]. Moskva [in Russian].
Tchoudinov, A. (2012). L’image de l’ennemi dans l’imaginaire collectif du menu peuple russe en 1812. Annales historiques de la Rȅvolution Française. Juillet-septembre, pp. 117-126. DOI: 10.4000/ahrf.12614 [in French].
Tiutchev, F.I. (1873). O tsenzure v Rossii. Pismo F.I. Tiutcheva k odnomu iz chlenov Gosudarstvennogo Soveta [About censorship in Russia. Letter from F. I. Tyutchev to one of the members of the State Council]. Russkii arkhiv, 4, 607-631 [in Russian].
Ulyanov, P.V. (2021). Ideia “edinstva slavian” v rossiiskoi propagande vo vremia Pervoi mirovoi voiny [The Idea of the “Unity of the Slavs” in Russian Propaganda during the First World War]. Bylye Gody, 16 (3), 1533-1541. DOI: 10.13187/bg.2021.3.1533 [in Russian].
Valuev, P.A. (1891). Duma russkogo (vo vtoroi polovine 1855 g.) [Thoughts of a Russian]. Russkaia starina, Mai, 349-359 [in Russian].
Wortman, R. (2004). Stsenarii vlasti. Mify i tseremonii russkoi monarkhii. Tom 2: Ot Aleksandra II do otrecheniia Nikolaia II [Scenarios of Power: Myth and Ceremony in Russian Monarchy. Volume Two: From Alexander II to the Abdication of Nicholas II]. Moskva [in Russian].
Yanov, A.L. (2002). Patriotizm i natsionalizm v Rossii. 1825-1921 [Patriotism and nationalism in Russia. 1825-1921]. Moskva: Akademkniga [in Russian].
Zashkilniak, L. (2002). Istoriia Polshchi: vid naidavnishykh chasiv do nashykh dniv [History of Poland: from the earliest times to the present day]. Lviv: Lvivskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni Ivana Franka [in Ukrainian].
Zemskyi, Yu.S. (2011). Polska, rosiiska ta ukrainska elity v zmahanniakh za Pravoberezhnu Ukrainu seredyny XIX st. [Polish, Russian and Ukrainian elites in the competition for Right-Bank Ukraine in the middle of the 19th century]. Khmelnytskyi [in Ukrainian].
Zemskyi, Yu. & Trygub, O. (2021). Polska problema u rosiiskii konservatyvnii politychnii dumtsi seredyny XX st. [The Polish problem in Russian conservative political thought in mid-19th century]. Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski, XII/1, 11-19. DOI: 10.31648/pw.6458 [in Ukrainian].
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
