Agentes in Rebus in Roman Empire of the 4th – 5th Centuries CE
Abstract
The purpose of the research paper is to study the agentes in rebus institution as an important element of the organization of the political system of the Later Roman Empire.
Scientific novelty: The peculiarities of the staffing, organization and management of the agentes in rebus corps are characterized. The official duties of agents at different stages of their career paths are analyzed. The nature of the unofficial missions performed by agents is uncovered. An attempt is made to determine whether it is possible to consider the agentes in rebus corps a Roman Secret Service.
Conclusions: In the course of the study, the main peculiarities of the agentes in rebus corps organization are analyzed. They were civil officials, although they kept the features of a military unit. The ‘special agents’ fell under the jurisdiction of the magister officiorum, although they also had immediate commanders. It is found out that the Imperial Codes distinguished three main categories of agents: couriers that carried imperial resolutions over the empire; curiosi, who were the inspectors of the State Postal Service; principes officii, who headed the secretariats of leading provincial officials at the level of the praetorian prefects and vicarii. In parallel with performing their main work, the agentes in rebus were informants and spies of emperors.
It is unveiled that, in practice, the activities of agentes in rebus from time to time went beyond the functions written down in the imperial legislation. Agentes regularly used the practice of whipping and imprisoning people who were considered suspicious. Occasionally, Agentes were engaged in intelligence outside the state, headed high-level embassies, participated in arrests, and even assassinated high-ranking persons, whom the state considered its enemies.
It is concluded that in general, the schola agentium in rebus had the features of the secret service, even though it in parallel performed ordinary bureaucratic duties. The activity of the corps was often negatively perceived by contemporaries from a moral point of view: agentes were blamed for corruption and false denunciations used for career growth. But with all the disadvantages, the existence of such a service was needed by the state, since it contributed to its centralization and full functioning.
References
Africa, T. (1971). Urban Violence in Imperial Rome. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 1 (2), 3-21 [in English].
Austin, N. & Rankov, N. (2014). Exploratio. Military and political intelligence in the Roman world from the Second Punic War to the battle of Adrianople. London: Routledge [in English].
Danilov, E (2009). Kontrrazvedyvatelnye funktsii agentes in rebus [Counterintelligence functions of agentes in rebus]. Aktualnye problemy istoricheskoi nauki: Mezhdunarodnyi sbornik nauchnykh trudov molodykh uchenykh, 6, 11-15 [in Russian].
Dymowski, A. (2013). Agentes in rebus. Antyczny rodowód współczesnych służb specjalnych [Agentes in rebus. The ancient lineage of modern secret services]. Przegląd Bezpieczeństwa Wewnętrznego, 5, 98-105 [in Polish].
Harries, J. & Wood, I. (1993). The Theodosian Code. Studies in Imperial Law of Late Antiquity. London: Duckworth & Co. Ltd [in English].
Jones, A.H.M. (1964). The Later Roman Empire. 284-602. Oxford: Blackwell [in English].
Jones, A.H.M. (Ed.) (1971). The Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire. Vol. 1: A.D. 260-395. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [in English].
Kelly, C. (2004). Ruling the Later Roman Empire. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press [in English].
MacMullen, R. (1964). Imperial Bureaucrats in the Roman Provinces. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 68, 305-316 [in English].
Pokrovskii, I. (1999). Istoriia rimskogo prava [History of Roman law]. Sankt-Peterburg: Letnii sad [in Russian].
Rankov, N. (1990). Frumentarii, the Castra Peregrina and the Provincial Officia. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 80, 176-182 [in English].
Sheldon, R. (2005). Intelligence Activities in Ancient Rome. London: Routledge [in English].
Sinnigen, W. (1961). The Roman Secret Service. The Classical Journal, 57 (2), 65-72 [in English].
Sinnigen, W. (1962). Three Administrative Changes Ascribed to Constantius II. The American Journal of Philology, 83 (4), 369-382 [in English].
Sinnigen, W. (1959). Two Branches of the Late Roman Secret Service. The American Journal of Philology, 80 (3), 238-254 [in English].
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.