Social Role of Cultural Heritage and Objectives of Monument Studies
Abstract
The purpose of the article to establish a connection between the tasks of memorials as scientific discipline and the special characteristics inherent to objects of cultural heritage as monuments of archaeology, history and culture.
The scientific novelty consists in the discovery and research of the axiological (value) information inherent in an authentic artifact – a monument of archaeology, history and culture – that has an emotional impact on an individual in order to determine his own coordinates in the spatio-temporal and socio-historical continuum, thus contributing, its socialization, and therefore to determine the methods and means of increasing the efficiency of the specified process.
Conclusions. A person due to the establishment of social ties both with the present and with the past (i.e. socialization), perceives himself as an integral part of a certain whole in social and historical aspects. As for modernity, it is provided by all existing culture, but the past in its materiality reaches us due to our cultural heritage – artifacts preserved in their authenticity. Being placed in the modern cultural context, the latter contribute to a kind of “immersion” of the individual in the past, establishing a personal emotional connection with it. At the same time, authentic artifacts play the role of monuments of archaeology, history, and monuments of culture for us depending on the historical or cultural context. This process for the purpose of study, use and improvement is the main subject of monument studies as a scientific discipline, which distinguishes the latter from other scientific disciplines, at the same time establishing a connection with them, which also investigate artifacts of the past (archaeology, source studies, etc.) however, they use the latter mainly for its study.
References
Boiarskyi, P.V. (1986). Teoreticheskie osnovy pamiatnikovedeniya (postanovka problemy) [Theoretical foundations of monument studies (problem statement)]. Pamiatnikovedenie: teoriya, metodologiya, praktika. Moskva, 9-31 [in Russian].
Boiarskyi, P. V. (1990). Vvedenie v pamiatnikovedenie [Introduction to monument studies]. Moskva: Tsentr “Kultura i Mirovoi okean” [in Russian].
Bondarets, O.V. (2021). Muzei: zberezhennia spadshchyny, osmyslennia mynuloho, formuvannia identychnosti [Museums: preservation of heritage, understanding of the past, formation of identity]. Naukovi zapysky NaUKMA. Istoriia i teoriia kultury, 4, 106-112. DOI: 10.18523/2617-8907.2021.4.106-112 [in Ukrainian].
Bykov, K.M. (Ed.) (1954). Pavlovskie klinicheskie sredy [Pavlov’s clinical environments]. Vol. 1. Moskva: AS of the Soviet Union Publ [in Russian].
Cloonan, M.V. (2007). The moral imperative to preserve. Library Trends, 55 (3), 746-755 [in English].
Gelvetsiy, K.A. (1994). Pro liudynu, yii rozumovi zdibnosti ta yii vykhovannia [About a man, his mental abilities and upbringing]. Кyiv: Osnovy [in Ukrainian].
Griffen, L.А. (1972). Das Shone in der Kunst und die Spezifik der aеsthetishen Information. Kunst und Literatur. Berlin, 8,17-26 [in German]
Griffen, L.O. (2014). Do pytannia pro peredistoriiu tekhniky [To the question about the background of technology]. Istoriia nauky i tekhniky, 4, 16-33 [in Ukrainian].
Griffen, L. (2021). The society as a superorganism. The scientific heritage, 67 (5), 51-60. DOI: 10.24412/9215-0365-2021-67-5-51-60 [in Ukrainian].
Griffen, L. & Ryzheva, N. (2020). Istoriko-kulturnoe nasledie kak socialnyj fenomen. [Historical and Cultural Heritage as Social Phenomenon]. Eminak, 2 (30), 238-247. DOI: 10.33782/eminak2020.2(30).42 [in Ukrainian].
Ivakin, H., & Tytova, O. (2007). Kryterii klasyfikatsii ta potsinuvannia pamiatok arkheolohii [Criteria for classification and appreciation of archaeological monuments]. Pamiatkoznavchi studii v Ukraini: teoriia i praktyka. Kyiv, 141-165 [in Ukrainian].
Kepin, D. (2005). Muzeiefikatsiia obiektiv arkheolohichnoi spadshchyny v Yevropi: na prykladi pamiatok pervisnoi kultury [Museification of archaeological heritage objects in Europe: on the example of monuments of primitive culture]. Kyiv : Tsentr pamiatkoznavstva NAN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
Lotman, Yu.M. (1967). K probleme tipologii kultury [On the problem of typology of culture]. Uchenye zapiski Tartuskogo universiteta, 198, 30-38 (Trudy po znakovym sistemam, 3) [in Russian].
Matlai, L.S. (2014). Istoryko-kulturna spadshchyna Ukrainy u tsyvilizatsiinomu dialozi [Historical and cultural heritage of Ukraine in civilizational dialogue]. Historical and cultural studies, 1, 45-48 [in Ukrainian].
Miroliubova, L.R. (1986). Veshchnaya sreda kak fenomen kultury [Essential environment as a phenomenon of culture]. Saratov: Izdatelskiy Tsentr «Nauka» [in Russian].
Mironova, I.S. (2017). Istorychne dzhereloznavstvo ta ukrainska arkheohrafiia [Historical source studies and Ukrainian archeography]. Mykolaiv: Vyd-vo ChNU im. Petra Mohyly [in Ukrainian].
Moles, А. (1966). Information theory and aesthetic perception. Urbana, University of Illinois Press [in English].
Moskalenko, V.V. (2013). Socializatsiia osobystosti [Socialization of personality]. Kyiv: Pheniks [in Ukrainian].
Nabok, S.V. (2018). Pamiatnyk yak marker: osoblyvosti funktsionuvannia v publichnomu prostori v konteksti polityky dekomunizatsii v Ukraini [Monument as a marker: features of functioning on public space in context the politics of decommunization in Ukraine]. Naukovi zapysky Instytutu politychnykh i etnonatsionalnykh doslidzhen im. I.F. Kurasa NAN Ukrainy, 3-4, 193-214 [in Ukrainian].
Pérez-Ramos, Y. & Ramiro-Esteban, D. (2020). Monumentos confrontados: nuevos roles para el patrimonio ante los desencuentros sociales. Ciudad Resignificada, 38, 58 (Julio), 44-61. DOI: 10.22320/07196466.2020.38.058.03 [in Spanish].
Riker, P. (1974) Conflict of interpretations. Essays on hermeneutics. Northwestern University Press [in English].
Shola, T. (1987). Predmet i osobennosti muzeologii [The subject and features of museology]. Muzei, 153, 53 [in Russian].
Vaidakher, F. (2005). Zahalna muzeolohiia [Zagalna museology]. Lviv: Litopys [in Ukrainian].
Vecherskyi, V. (2004). Vynyknennia i rozvytok mizhnarodnoi okhorony kulturnykh tsinnostei [Emergence and development of international protection of cultural values] Pratsi sentru pamiatkoznavstva, 6, 225-238 [in Ukrainian].
Copyright (c) 2023 Leonid Griffen, Nadiia Ryzheva

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.