United States – Azerbaijan Relations (1991-2020)
Abstract
The purpose of the paper is to thoroughly investigate the intricate relationship between the United States and Azerbaijan from 1991 to 2020, considering diplomatic, political, economic, and security dimensions. Emphasizing the pivotal role of Russian Federation in the South Caucasus, the research seeks to provide a holistic understanding of the factors influencing U.S.-Azerbaijan relations, offering valuable insights into evolving geopolitical dynamics over the three crucial decades.
The novelty of the paper lies in its in-depth exploration of three decades of U.S.-Azerbaijan relations, the study provides unique insights into the evolving dynamics, contributing a comprehensive analysis of the multifaceted relationship.
Conclusions. The author identifies 4 periods of US-Azerbaijan relations in 1991-2020: 1) 1991-2001, 2) 2001-2007, 3) 2007-2015, and 4) 2015-2020.
From 1991 to 2001, the United States underwent a transformative phase in its policy towards Azerbaijan, marked by an increased focus on regional stability and economic partnerships through energy initiatives like the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline. Security concerns in the South Caucasus also influenced policy decisions, while considerations of democracy and human rights were weighed against broader strategic imperatives. This period set the foundation for subsequent shifts in U.S. policy towards Azerbaijan.
In 2001-2007, U.S. policy towards Azerbaijan underwent significant changes, prioritizing the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline and intensifying efforts in combatting international terrorism. The Global War on Terror played a crucial role, leading to strengthened U.S.-Azerbaijan relations, though democracy promotion took a back seat to energy and security interests.
The period from 2007 to 2015 saw a nuanced shift, with decreased U.S. focus on energy and security, increased attention to democracy and human rights, and challenges arising from Azerbaijan’s opposition to the Turkish-Armenian Rapprochement. Azerbaijan’s strategic concerns regarding Nagorno-Karabakh intensified, and U.S. engagement faced limitations in influencing regional outcomes.
Between 2015 and 2020, U.S. policy towards Azerbaijan further disengaged across energy, security, and democracy promotion dimensions, influenced by factors like the unconventional oil and gas revolution, decreasing Central Asia significance, rising isolationism, and the Trump administration’s priorities. The U.S. response to regional dynamics, notably the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, showcased a trend of reduced involvement.
References
Akerman, E. & Herd, G.P. (2004). Russian Foreign Policy: The CIS and the Baltic States. In Ros, C. (Ed.). Russian Politics under Putin. Manchester and NY: Manchester University Press.
Albright, M. (1999). Statement before the Senate Appropriations Committee on Foreign Operations. US Department of State, Archive. Retrieved from http://1997-2001.state.gov/www/statements/1999/990520.html
Alieva, L. (2006). Azerbaijan’s Frustrating Elections. Journal of Democracy, 17 (2), 147-160.
Ambrosio, T. (2002). Congressional Perceptions of Ethnic Cleansing: Reactions to the Nagorno-Karabakh War and the Influence of Ethnic Interest Groups. The Review of International Affairs, 2 (1), 24-45.
Ambrosio, T. (2009). Authoritarian backlash: Russian resistance to democratization in the former Soviet Union. Farnham: Ashgate Publ. Company.
Austvik, O.G. (2016). The Energy Union and security-of-gas supply. Energy Policy, 96, 372-382. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.06.013
Baker, P. (1997, August 2). Clinton Courts Head of Oil-Rich Azerbaijan. Washington Post. Retrieved from https://wapo.st/47A8tjn
Bakhshaliyev, A. (2021). 1990 sonrası Rusya-Azerbaycan ilişkileri [Russia-Azerbaijan relations after 1990]. Karabük: Karabük Üniversitesi [in Turkish].
Bang, G. (2010). Energy security and climate change concerns: Triggers for energy policy change in the United States? Energy Policy, 38 (4), 1645-1653.
Bashirov, G. (2017). US Foreign Policy toward Azerbaijan, 1991-2015. FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. DOI: 10.25148/etd.FIDC001782
Bashirov, G. (2019). Energy, security and democracy: the shifting US policy in Azerbaijan. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32 (6), 771-798. DOI: 10.1080/09557571.2019.1624689
Berman, I. (2001). Slouching toward Eurasia? Perspectives, 12 (1) (September-October), 1-9. Retrieved from https://open.bu.edu/handle/2144/3589
Bouchet, N. (2013). The democracy tradition in US foreign policy and the Obama presidency. International Affairs, 89 (1), 31-51.
Bouchet, N. (2015). Democracy Promotion as US Foreign Policy: Bill Clinton and Democratic Enlargement. London: Routledge.
Bölükbaşı, S. (2011). Azerbaijan: A Political History. London: I.B. Tauris.
Bush, G. (2008, May 01). Statement on World Press Freedom Day. The American Presidency Project. Retrieved from http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=77229
Carothers, T. (2000). The Clinton Record on Democracy Promotion. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Carothers, T. (2007). US Democracy Promotion during and after Bush. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Cheney, D. (2001). National Energy Policy: Report of the National Energy Policy Development Group. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Clinton, H. (2012, June 6). Remarks With Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov. U.S. Department of State. Diplomacy In Action. Retrieved from https://2009-2017.state.gov/secretary/20092013clinton/rm/2012/06/191855.htm
Cox, M. (2000). Wilsonianism Resurgent? The Clinton Administration and the Promotion of Democracy. In Cox, M., Ikenberry, J. & Inoguchi, T. (Eds.). American Democracy Promotion: Impulses, Strategies, and Impacts. Oxford, 2000. Pp. 218-240. DOI: 10.1093/0199240973.003.0011
Cornell, S. (2011). Azerbaijan since Independence. New York: Routledge.
Giorgadze, K. (2002). Russia: Regional Partner of Aggressor? The Review of International Affairs, 2 (1), 64-79.
Goldberg, J. (1998, October 4). The Crude Face of Global Capitalism. The New York Times Magazine, 51.
Gül, M. (2008). Russia and Azerbaijan: Relations after 1989. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations, 7 (2-3), 47-66.
Jackson, N.J. (2003). Russian Foreign Policy and the CIS: Theories, Debates and Actions. London; NY: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203716229
Jahangirli, J. (2021). Contradictions of Realism and Liberalism on Interstate Relations: in the Case of Russo-Georgian War. Grani, 24 (11), 55-66. DOI: 10.15421/1721109
Kerry, J., et al. (Ed.) (2012). US Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations Energy and Security from the Caspian to Europe, S. Rep. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, pp. 112-142. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3U0uFzZ
Kramer, D. & Kauzlarich, R. (2016). It’s time for the United States to act on Azerbaijan. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://wapo.st/3O7tv1O
Kuchins, A. & Sanderson, T. (2010). The Northern Distribution Network and Afghanistan Geopolitical Challenges and Opportunities. Washington DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Manning, R. & Jaffe, A. (1998). The Myth of the Caspian ‘Great Game’: The Real Geopolitics of Energy. Survival, 40 (4), 112-129.
Maresca, J. (1996). Lost Opportunities in Negotiating the Conflict over Nagorno Karabakh. International Negotiation, 1 (3), 471-499.
Maresca, J.J. (1996). Lost Opportunities in Negotiating the Conflict over Nagorno Karabakh. International Negotiation, 1 (3), 471-499. DOI: 10.1163/157180696X00188
Mitchell, L. (2012). The Color Revolutions. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Nichol, J. (1995). Transcaucasus Newly Independent States: Political Developments and Implications for US Interests. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
Nichol, J. (2002). Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia: Political Developments and Implications for US Interests. Darby: DIANE Publishing. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/48DuZZI
Priego, A. (2008). NATO Cooperation Towards South Caucasus. Caucasian Review of International Affairs, 2 (1), 50-57.
Quigley, S. (2006, March 9). European Command Transforming to Accommodate New Challenges. American Forces Press Service. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3HrsJsN
Ratner, M., Belkin, P., Nichol, J. & Woehrel, S. (2013). Europe’s energy security: options and challenges to natural gas supply diversification. Congressional Research Service. Retrieved from https://sgp.fas.org/crs/row/R42405.pdf
Roberts, J. (2017). The Southern Gas Corridor. In: Hafner, M., Tagliapietra, S. (Eds). The European Gas Markets. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp. 315-357. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-55801-1_14
Scott, J.M. & Carter, R.G. (2016). Promoting democracy in Latin America: Foreign policy change and US democracy assistance, 1975-2010. Third World Quarterly, 37 (2), 299-320. DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1108824
Serafino, N. (2013). Security Assistance Reform: “Section 1206” Background and Issues for Congress. Washington: Congressional Research Service.
Shaffer, B. (2010). Caspian energy phase II: Beyond 2005. Energy Policy, 38 (11), 7209-7215. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.07.051
Socor, V. (2010). Clinton Follows Gates in Fence Mending Visit to Azerbaijan (Part One). Eurasia Daily Monitor, 7 (131). In Jamestown Foundation. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/48DLkO7
Stokes, D. & Raphael, S. (2010). Global Energy Security and American Hegemony. Baltimore: JHU Press.
Volker, K. (2014, March 18). Where’s NATO’s Strong Response to Russia’s Invasion of Crimea? Foreign Policy. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3tUI6a1
Zainullina, N. (2020). Political and legal status of the Caspian Sea: The position of the Republic of Kazakhstan in regard to the Caspian Sea. Kocaeli: Kocaeli Üniversitesi.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.