Between Rebellion and Loyalty: Decisive Moments of Ukrainian History of the 17th and early 18th centuries in Modern Public Reception of Ukraine

Keywords: historical heroes, events of the 17th century, Ukrainian YouTube channels, Ukrainian history

Abstract

The purpose of the research paper is based on the processing of video materials on Ukrainian history of the period of the 17th century of the beginning of the 18th century, posted on the leading Ukrainian historical YouTube channels, to determine the top historical heroes and events that arouse the greatest interest from the audience.

The scientific novelty of the study consists in the first attempt at content analysis of the Ukrainian segment of YouTube of a historical orientation, defined by popular Ukrainian heroes and events of the 17th century, which changed the historical and geopolitical development of Ukraine, by applying innovative computer methods.

Conclusions. As a result of the conducted research, it was found that among the video material we processed on Ukrainian historical YouTube channels, the top period of the 17th century – the beginning of the 18th century among the users of these channels is the period of the Cossack state. A period of political and social turbulence, wars of the Ukrainian Cossacks for the independence of the Ukrainian state and its geopolitical place in the contemporary arena of international relations. When looking for allies to fight for the independence of Ukraine at that time, there was a tendency to change them. Top historical heroes are Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and Ivan Mazepa, who for Ukrainians are the creators of Ukrainian statehood and fighters for its independence and foreign political influence.

One of the most popular topics is the Pereiaslav Agreement with Muscovy concluded by B. Khmelnytskyi, which became a key event in the transition of Ukraine from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth to Muscovy. And it is this event that arouses the greatest interest among users of Ukrainian historical YouTube channels. In our opinion, this is explained by the desire of Ukrainians to understand the long-term mythologizing of this agreement, which was created by the Soviet authorities, as well as the conditions that led to the long-term loss of independence by Ukrainians. In this case, the top metaphor ‘The return of history’ is absolutely logical, which stems from the desire of users of Ukrainian historical YouTube channels, the number of which increased significantly in July-December 2023, to know a new perspective on Ukrainian history, and not the creation of imperial-Soviet ideology. This trend is especially observed with the beginning of the full-scale Russian-Ukrainian war, which significantly affected the perception of Ukrainians about their past. And this is actually the beginning of the formation of a new historical consciousness, which is the key to building a strong Ukrainian state.

Funding. The work was supported by the National Science Centre (Poland) under the research project ‘Historical narratives in Web 2.0 as a functional element of national identities in Central and Eastern Europe’, № UMO-2020/39/B/HS3/01237.

References

channel (2019). Bohdan Khmelnytskyi: the story of the hetman who managed to unite Ukrainian territories. 24 kanal, 9 travnia. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/4cllGQe [in Ukrainian].

Buket, Ye. (2022, January 18). The Pereiaslav Council as the starting point of the Moscow occupation. Armiia Inform. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3XEqn32 [in Ukrainian].

Dzihora, K. (2022). Representation of historical memory in social networking communities. Skhid, 3 (1), 15-24. DOI: 10.21847/1728-9343.2022.3(1).254336 [in Ukrainian].

Cheng, Xu, Cameron, D. & Jiangchuan, L. (2008). Statistics and social network of youtube videos. In 16th International Workshop on Quality of Service. IEEE. [in English].

Fanailova, O. (2022, February 5). Peter and Mazepa. Why the hetman cursed by Moscow was not a traitor – a view from Russia. Radio Svoboda. Retrieved from https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/hetman-ivan-mazepa-i-rosiya/31687163.html [in Ukrainian].

Halchinskyi, A., Zdioruk, S. (2004, January 31). The Treaty of Pereiaslav in 1654: historical lessons for the Ukrainian people. Analytical assessments of the National Institute of Strategic Den, 16. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/4co7shq [in Ukrainian].

Kasian, A., Platmir, Ya. & Khomenko, D. (2020). Peculiarities of the source complex of research of memory policy in the Russian-occupied territories of Ukraine. Visnyk Cherkaskoho universytetu. Seria istoriia, 2, 14-25. DOI: 10.31651/2076-5908-2020-2-14-25 [in Ukrainian].

Khardel, R. & Vyzdryk, V. (2019). The historical factor of Russian information warfare against Ukraine. The historical consciousness as information impact object in internet media. Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu. Seriia Zhurnalistyka, 45, 100-107. DOI: 10.30970/vjo.2019.45.9990 [in Ukrainian].

Kuznetsova, I. (2010, August 7). Who was Bohdan Khmelnytskyi for Ukraine? Radio Svoboda. Retrieved from https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/2120813.html [in Ukrainian].

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. London: The university of Chicago press [in English].

Paolillo, J., Ghule, S. & Harper, B. (2019). A network view of social media platform history: Social structure, dynamics and content on YouTube. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences [in English].

Radio Svoboda (2002, January 22). Historical traditions and politics. Radio Svoboda. Retrieved from https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/885715.html [in Ukrainian].

Rutten, E., Fedor, Ju. & Zvereva, V. (2013). Memory, Conflict and New Media. Web wars in post-socialist states. London-New-York: Routledge. Taylor & Francis Group [in English].

Stepanenko, V. (2010, December 15). Only slaves glorify their executioners. Istorychna Pravda. Retrieved from https://www.istpravda.com.ua/columns/4d0872d15e44e/ [in Ukrainian].

Telvak, V. & Werner, W. (2023). Interest in Historical Figures on the World Wide Web as a Marker of Historical Consciousness in Contemporary Ukraine. Eminak, 1 (41), 234-254. DOI: 10.33782/eminak2023.1(41).635 [in English].

Trzoss, A., Werner, W., Kleist, C., Kwiatkowska-Moskalewicz, K. & Moskalewicz, M. (2023). The politicisation of historical memory on Twitter: ‘Positive antisemitism’ in the Holocaust debate in Poland. Rethinking History, 27 (4), 780-810. DOI: 10.1080/13642529.2023.2248451 [in English].

Yanovskyi, O. (2019, January 19). The Pereiaslav council of 1654: ‘betrayal’ or ‘victory’? Krym.Realii. Retrieved from https://ua.krymr.com/a/pereiaslavska-rada-1654-roku-zrada-chy-peremoha/29719524.html

Published
15.07.2024
How to Cite
Vovchuk, L., & Werner, W. (2024). Between Rebellion and Loyalty: Decisive Moments of Ukrainian History of the 17th and early 18th centuries in Modern Public Reception of Ukraine. Eminak: Scientific Quarterly Journal, (2(46), 44-61. https://doi.org/10.33782/eminak2024.2(46).705
Section
Modern History