Black Sea Geopolitics and the Status of the Straits in Romanian-Turkish Diplomatic Relations: From Lausanne to Montreux (1923-1936)
Abstract
The purpose of the research paper is to analyse the reasons behind Romania’s support for Turkey at the Montreux Conference, by looking at diplomatic documents and correspondence kept by the Romanian Ministry for Foreign Affairs; to compare the advantages and disadvantages between the two doctrines concerning the legal status of waterways; to compare the provisions of the two conventions.
The novelty of the research paper is based on documentation and content analysis of emblematical conventions and doctrines, of archival and historiographic material, and of secondary bibliography concerning the issue of the Straits, in contrast with observation, analysis, and synthesis of recent, publicly circulated information, relating to the Straits and the Black Sea’s status within the wartime context in Ukraine.
Conclusions. The ongoing war in Ukraine has reopened, at least at diplomatic and international relations levels, discussions concerning Black Sea geopolitics, especially on the status of the Bosphorus and the Dardanelles. The Regime of the Straits is what ultimately determines the opening or closing of the Black Sea, especially in exceptional circumstances, such as those generated by military conflicts within its basin. The current legal status of the Straits has been established since the interwar period, because of evolving international law in this matter, but also as a necessary measure in establishing an international regime for them, one that Russia would have to respect.
Through the Lausanne Convention relating to the Regime of the Straits (July 24th, 1923), the Black Sea was opened to all ships in peacetime, and under certain conditions in wartime, if Turkey would be neutral. The Lausanne Convention also established an International Commission meant to oversee the keeping of the international regime of the Straits. A Romanian representative was present within this body, until its dissolution in November 1936. The Lausanne Convention was a triumph of the legal doctrine regarding the international nature of waterways, which provided for the supervision of freedom and equality in treatment for all flags, through international commissions of littoral states and representatives of major powers.
Evidently, Lausanne hurt Turkey’s interests as riparian, and the country sought all possible means to restore its full authority over the Straits. It achieved this through the new International Convention on the Regime of the Straits (Montreux – July 20th, 1936), by which it was given full rights, by following the legal doctrine of the right of littoral states to their own territory (opposed to the Lausanne doctrine). In reaching this objective, Turkey needed international support, and found one if its biggest collaborators in Romania, even though Bucharest had more advantages from the Lausanne provisions.
References
Bobroff, R. (2000). Behind the Balkan Wars: Russian Policy toward Bulgaria and the Turkish Straits, 1912-13. Russian Review, 59 (1), 76-95 [in English].
Bobroff, R. (2006). Roads to Glory. Late Imperial Russia and the Turkish Straits. London: I.B. Tauris [in English].
Boșcan, L. & Radu, C.C. (2021). Activitatea diplomației române în Comisia Internațională a Strâmtorilor, 1924-1933 [The activity of Romanian diplomacy in the International Commission of the Straits, 1924-1933]. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Argonaut [in Romanian].
Brătianu, G.I. (1988). Marea Neagră. De la origini până la cucerirea otomană [The Black Sea. From its origins to the Ottoman conquest]. Vol. I-II. Bucharest: Editura Meridiane [in Romanian].
Braudel, F. (1989). Timpul lumii [The Perspective of the World], Vol. I-II. Bucharest: Editura Meridiane [in Romanian].
Caminos, H. & Cogliati-Bantz, V. (2014). The Legal Regime of the Straits: Contemporary Challenges and Solutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [in English].
Ciachir, N. (1979). The Adrianople Treaty (1829) and Its European Implications. Revue des études sud-est européennes, 17 (4), 695-713 [in English].
Cojocaru, I. (2010, February 19). De la războiul greco-turc la conferinţele de la Lausanne şi Montreux [From the Greek-Turkish war to the conferences of Lausanne and Montreux]. Retrieved from https://ionutcojocaru.ro/2010/02/19/de-la-razboiul-greco-turc-la-conferintele-de-la-lausanne-si-montreux/ [in Romanian].
Copcea, I. (2022, May 19). Cele 5 tipuri de nave civile folosite de ruși în scopuri militare. Cum încalcă Rusia Convenția de la Montreux [The 5 types of civilian ships used by the Russians for military purposes. How Russia violates the Montreux Convention]. Retrieved from https://www.defenseromania.ro/cele-5-tipuri-de-nave-civile-folosite-de-rusi-in-scopuri-militare-cum-incalca-rusia-conventia-de-la-montreux_616493.html [in Romanian].
Cucoș, C. (2023). Chestiunea strâmtorilor Bosfor și Dardanele [The matter of Bosphorus and Dardanelles straits]. Gândirea militară românească, 1, 100-125 [in Romanian].
Daşcovici, N. (1943). Regimul Dunării și al strâmtorilor în ultimele două decenii (cu o anexă documentară) [The Regime of the Danube and the Straits in the last two decades (with a documentary appendix)]. Iași: Tipografia Ţerek [in Romanian].
Dungaciu, D. (Ed.) (2019). Enciclopedia de diplomație [Diplomacy encyclopaedia]. Bucharest: Editura Rao [in Romanian].
Florescu, G.G. (1975). Navigația în Marea Neagră, prin strâmtori și pe Dunăre. Contribuții la studiul dreptului riveranilor [Navigation in the Black Sea, through the Straits and on the Danube. Contributions to the study of riparian law]. Bucharest: Editura Academiei [in Romanian].
Gheorghe, G. (1980). Tratatele internaționale ale României 1921-1939 [Romania’s international treaties]. Bucharest: Editura Științifică și Enciclopedică [in Romanian].
Gogeanu, P. (1966). Strâmtorile Mării Negre de-a lungul istoriei [The Straits of the Black Sea throughout history]. Bucharest: Editura Politică [in Romanian].
Graebner, N.A. & Bennett, E.M. (2011). The Versailles Treaty and Its Legacy. The Failure of the Wilsonian Vision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [in English].
Macfie, A.L. (1981). The Straits Question, 1908-1914. Balkan Studies, 22 (2), 321-332 [in English].
Mamina, I. & Scurtu, I. (1996). Guverne şi guvernanți (1916-1938) [Governments and governors]. Bucharest: Editura Silex [in Romanian].
Meleșcanu, T. (2012). Regimul Strâmtorilor Mării Negre [Regime of the Black Sea Straits]. Monitor Strategic, 1-2, 5-8 [in Romanian].
Potra, G.G. (Ed.) (2012). Pro și contra Titulescu [For and against Titulescu]. Vol. I-III. Bucharest: Fundația Europeană Titulescu [in Romanian].
Preston, D. (2021). Opt zile la Ialta. Cum au prefigurat Churchill, Roosevelt și Stalin lumea postbelică [Eight days in Yalta. How Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin foreshadowed the post-war world]. Bucharest: Editura Rao [in Romanian].
Puryear, V.J. (1931). England, Russia, and the Straits Question 1844-1856. Berkeley: University of California Press [in English].
Rozakis, C.L. & Stagos, P.N. (1987). The Turkish Straits (International Straits of the World, Vol. 9). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers [in English].
Seftiuc, I. & Cârțână, I. (1974). România și problema Strâmtorilor [Romania and the issue of the Straits], Bucharest: Editura Științifică [in Romanian].
Seydi, S. (2010). The Turkish Straits and the Great Powers. From the Montreux Convention to the Early Cold War, 1936-1947. Istanbul: The Isis Press [in English].
Thompson, J.A. (2002). Woodrow Wilson. Pearson Education Limited [in English].
Titulescu, N. (1967). Discursuri [Discourse]. Bucharest: Editura Ştiinţifică [in Romanian].
Titulescu, N. (1967). Documente diplomatice [Diplomatic documents]. Bucharest: Editura Politică [in Romanian].
Titulescu, N. (1994). Politica externă a României (1937) [Romania’s foreign policy]. Bucharest: Editura Enciclopedică [in Romanian].
Tuluș, A.V. (2017). Nicolae Titulescu’s position on the international regime of waterways. The International Straits Commission versus the European Commission of the Danube. Danubius, 35, 117-132 [in English].
Tuluș, A.V. (2018). Dunărea de Jos. Scurt istoric / The Lower Danube. A Brief History. Brăila: Editura Istros [in Romanian & English].
Ünlü, N. (2002). The Legal Regime of the Turkish Straits. Brill [in English].
Wolf, L. (2011). Woodrow Wilson and the reimagining of Eastern Europe. California: Stanford University Press [in English].
Yücel, Z. (2023). The Turkish Straits. Treaties and Conventions. London: IJOPEC Publication [in English].

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.