Pepper, Power, and Resistance: The Keratuan Darah Putih and Global Trade Networks in South Lampung (17th–18th century)
Abstract
The purpose of the research paper is to examine the historical dynamics of the Keratuan Darah Putih, a traditional political institution in South Lampung (Indonesia), within the framework of 17th–18th century global trade networks. In this period, the pepper trade, Lampung’s most valuable commodity, was tightly controlled by the Banten Sultanate, a dominant Islamic polity on the northwestern coast of Java that served as the primary hub of the regional pepper trade and issued charters to local rulers to regulate production and exchange. The Keratuan Darah Putih, initially centered at Benteng Saksi before relocating to Kuripan Saka, maintained close relations with Banten but also developed its own strategies when confronted with the growing dominance of the Dutch East India Company (VOC). Against this background, the study aims to trace how this polity adapted its economic and political position while engaging with competing foreign powers.
Scientific novelty. The research combines archaeological and historical approaches to reconstruct the role of South Lampung in wider maritime networks. Excavations at Benteng Saksi and Kuripan Saka yielded ceramics, local pottery, bronze slag, and numismatic evidence, including Chinese cash coins and an English East India Company (EIC) coin. These findings, supported by historical records and oral traditions, demonstrate that the Keratuan Darah Putih actively developed alternative trade relations beyond Banten and the VOC, particularly through connections with the EIC based in Bengkulu. Such material evidence provides new insights into the adaptive strategies of local elites who resisted monopolistic control by shifting their trade orientation westward, thereby maintaining access to global markets.
Conclusions. The study concludes that the Keratuan Darah Putih was not a passive subject of Banten but an active agent within Southeast Asia’s maritime trade networks. Its privileged status under Banten, exemption from forced pepper cultivation, and subsequent resistance to the VOC monopoly illustrate a trajectory of negotiation, adaptation, and resilience. Archaeological remains confirm that economic exchanges occurred through reciprocal, redistributive, and market mechanisms embedded in social and political institutions. By integrating archaeological discoveries with historical accounts, this research underscores the significance of South Lampung as a nodal point of pepper commerce, political contestation, and cultural transformation in the early modern period. It highlights how local polities leveraged geography, trade routes, and foreign alliances to assert autonomy in the face of regional and colonial pressures, thereby contributing to a broader understanding of the historical processes that shaped global trade in Southeast Asia.
References
Abd Ghafur (2022). Economic Anthropology. Iqtishodiyah: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam, 8 (1), 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55210/iqtishodiyah.v8i1.768 [in Indonesian]
Amran, F. (2015, June 20). Coming for the Pepper. Lampung Post, Lampung Tumbai section, p. 16 [in Indonesian].
Amran, F. (2016, January 3). Köhler’s Contribution to the History of Lampung. Lampung Post, Lampung Tumbai section, p. 14 [in Indonesian].
Ariwibowo, G.A. (2018). Economic and Trading Activities in Lampung in the Period 1856 Until 1930. Patanjala, 10 (2), 331-346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30959/patanjala.v10i2.361 [in Indonesian].
Ariwibowo, G.A. (2018). Tulang Bawang River in the Pepper Commerced in Lampung on 1684-1914. Jurnal Masyarakat Dan Budaya, 19 (2), 253-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14203/jmb.v19i2.442 [in Indonesian].
Bassett, D.K. (1964). British Trade and Policy in Indonesia 1760-1772. Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde, 120 (2), 197-223 [in English].
Bellina, B. (2022). Southeast Asian Evidence for Early Maritime Silk Road Exchange and Trade-Related Polities. In Higham, C.F.W., & Kim, N.C. (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Early Southeast Asia (pp. 458-500). Oxford: Oxford University Press [in English].
Bertran, P., Todisco, D., Bordes, J.-G., Discamps, E., & Vallin, L. (2019). Perturbation assessment in archaeological sites as part of the taphonomic study: a review of methods used to document the impact of natural processes on site formation and archaeological interpretations. Paleo Revue d’Archeologie Prehistorique, 30 (1), 52-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/paleo.4378 [in English].
Bukri, Sayuti, H., Soepangat, & Sukiji (1997/1998). The History of the Lampung Region. Bandar Lampung: Departemen Pendidikan Dan kebudayaan [in Indonesian].
Cortesao, A. (1967). The Suma Oriental Of Tome Pires: An Account Of The East, From The Red Sea To Japan. Nendelnd iechtenstein: Kraus Reprint Limited [in English].
Creswell, J.W. (1994). Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. California: Sage Publications Inc [in English].
Deventer, M.L. van. (1886). Geschiedenis der Nederlanders op Java [History of the Dutch on Java]. Haarlem: H.D. Tjeenk Willink [in Dutch].
Dhobi, S. (2022). PhD Research in Humanities & Social Sciences: Methods & Approaches. Patan Pragya, 10 (1), 179-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/pragya.v10i01.50755 [in English].
Djajadiningrat, H. (1983). A Critical Review of Sajarah Banten. Jakarta: Djambatan [in Indonesian].
Douglass, M.J., Wandsnider, L.A., & Holdaway, S.J. (2023). Surface Artifact Scatters, Data Collection, and Significance: Case Studies from Australia and the United States. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 11 (1), 29-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2022.37 [in English].
Falah, W., et al. (2021). The Geology of the Benteng Saksi and Kuripan Saka Sites, South Lampung Regency. Panalungtik, 4 (1), 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24164/pnk.v4i1.47 [in Indonesian]
Groeneveldt, W.P. (1960). Historical Notes on Indonesia and Malaya: Compiled from Chinese Source. Jakarta: Bhratara [in English].
Gungwu, W. (1958). The Nanhai Trade: A Study of the Early History of Chinese Trade in the South China Sea. Journal of the Malayan Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 31 (2), 3-135 [in English].
Hadimuljono (1982). Some Notes on the Trade of Chinese Ceramics in Indonesia in the 16th and 17th Centuries. Pertemuan Ilmiah Arkeologi II. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional [in Indonesian].
Hakiki, K.M., Effendi, E., Badruzaman, B., Badi’ah, S., & Musofa, A. (2021). The Dalung Kuripan Inscription: Documentation of the Banten – Lampung Agreement of 1552. Al-Adyan: Jurnal Studi Lintas Agama, 15 (2), 301-326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/ajsla.v15i2.8214 [in Indonesia].
Hamid, A.R. (2024). The Dynamics of Lampung Pepper Trade Network in 16th–18th Century. Buletin Al-Turas, 30 (2), 145-160 [in English].
Herlina, N. (2024). Bengkulu: Before and After the London Treaty. Jurnal Kajian Budaya Dan Humaniora, 6 (2), 103-109 [in Indonesian].
Hodder, I. (1982). Towards a Contextual Approach to Prehistoric Exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [in English].
Imadudin, I. (2016). Pepper Trade in Lampung in Three Eras (1653-1930). Patanjala, 8 (3), 349-364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30959/patanjala.v8i3.14 [in Indonesian].
Ju-kua, C. (1911). Chu-fan-chi: Chinese and Arab Trade in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries. St. Petersburg: The Imperial academy of sciences [in English].
Köhler, J.H.R. (1874). Bijdrage tot de Kennis der Geschiedenis van de Lampongs. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandsch-Indie (new series), 3, 122-151, 325-351 [in Dutch].
Manguin, P.-Y. (2021). Srivijaya: Trade and Connectivity in the Pre-modern Malay World. Journal of Urban Archaeology, 3, 87-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1484/j.jua.5.123677 [in English].
Masroh, L. (2015). Pepper Plantations and Trade in Lampung, 1816-1942. Sejarah Dan Budaya, 9 (1), 64-78 [in Indonesia].
Maulana, W.I., Astana, C.B., Wijayanti, F., & Kumalasari, D. (2024). Maritime Activities of the Demak Sultanate: Shipping and Trade Route in the Nusantara Network (1478-1546). Journal of Al-Tamaddun, 19 (1), 261-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22452/JAT.vol19no1.19 [in English].
McGee, T.G. (1969). The Southeast Asian City: A Social Geography of the Primate Cities of Southeast Asia. London: Bell and Sons [in English].
Miksic, J.N. (1984). Regional Analysis and the Development of High Culture in South Sumatra. Berkala Arkeologi, 5 (1), 9-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30883/jba.v5i1.263 [in Indonesian].
Nurhakim, L., & Fadillah, M.A. (1990). Lada: The Political Economy of Banten in Lampung. In Analisis Hasil Penelitian Arkeologi III: Agrikultur Berdasarkan Data Arkeologi, (pp. 258-274). Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI [in Indonesian].
Ota, A. (2008). Cooperation, Compromise, and Network-making: State-Society Relationship in the Sultanate of Banten, 1750-1808. Southeast Asia: History and Culture, 37, 137-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5512/sea.2008.37_137 [in English].
Ota, A. (2009). “Illicit Trade” in South Sumatra: Local Society’s Response to Trade Expansion, C. 1760-1800. Taiwan Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 6 (2), 3-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7039/TJSAST.200910.0003 [in English].
Ragir, S. (1967). A Review of Technique for Archaeological Sampling. In Heizer, R.F. & Graham, J.A. (Eds.). A Guide to Field Methods in Archaeology: Approaches to The Anthropology of The Dead. Palo Alto, CA: The National Press, 181-210 [in English].
Reid, A. (1999). From Expansion to Crisis: Global Trade Networks in Southeast Asia, 1450-1680. Vol. II. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor [in Indonesian].
Saptono, N. (2010). The Lampung-Banten Exchange Model in the 16th–18th Centuries. In Harkantiningsih, N.T. (Ed.), Perdagangan dan Pertukaran Masa Prasejarah-Kolonial. Jatinangor: Alqaprint [in Indonesian].
Saptono, N. (2022). Peppers Transportation System on Production Stage: Archaeological Study on Lampung Society During Banten Sultanate Era. In Uus Faizal and Gemala (Ed.). Proceedings of the International Forum on Spice Route 2022. Jakarta: The National Research and Innovation Agency and Negeri Rempah Foundation, 336-350 [in English].
Smith, M.E., Feinman, G.M., Drennan, R.D., Earle, T., & Morris, I. (2012). Archaeology as a social science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109 (20), 7617-7621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1201714109 [in English].
Steward, J.H. (1942). The Direct Historical Approach to Archaeology. American Antiquity, 7 (4), 337-343 [in English].
Surya, R.A. (2022). VOC and Chinese in Java: Identifying the Migration Motives in the Seventeenth Century. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2 (6), 109-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24018/ejsocial.2022.2.6.354 [in English].
Syukron Jauhar Fuad Faizin (2023). Spices and Diplomacy of the Banten Sultanate with Foreign Kingdoms in the 16th–19th Century. Journal of Islamic History and Manuscript, 2 (2), 161-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24090/jihm.v2i2.9362 [in English].
Triwurjani, Rr (2011). Trade During Pre-Sriwijaya (4th-5th Centuries AD). Berkala Arkeologi, 31 (1), 57-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30883/jba.v31i1.418 [in English].
Wijaya, D.N. (2017). Thomas Stamford Raffles in Bengkulu: Politician or Scientist? Paramita – Historical Studies Journal, 27 (1), 50-62 [in Indonesian].
Wiryawan, B., Marsden, B., & Dutton, I.M. (1999). Atlas of Coastal Resource Areas of Lampung: Results and Processes. Jurnal pesisir dan lautan, 2 (3), 27-41 [in Indonesia].

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



